Posted on 2009 December 26 by BBVM
Objective Confirmation of Subjective Measures of Human Well-Being: Evidence from the U.S.A.
Andrew J. Oswald1,* and Stephen Wu2
A huge research literature, across the behavioral and social sciences, uses information on individuals’ subjective well-being. These are responses to questions—asked by survey interviewers or medical personnel—such as “how happy do you feel on a scale from 1 to 4?” Yet there is little scientific evidence that such data are meaningful. This study examines a 2005–2008 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System random sample of 1.3 million United States citizens. Life-satisfaction in each U.S. state is measured. Across America, people’s answers trace out the same pattern of quality of life as previously estimated, using solely nonsubjective data, in a literature from economics (so-called “compensating differentials” neoclassical theory due originally to Adam Smith). There is a state-by-state match (r = 0.6, P < 0.001) between subjective and objective well-being. This result has some potential to help to unify disciplines.
1 Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
2 Department of Economics, Hamilton College, Clinton, NY 13323, USA.
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: email@example.com
Filed under: Education Industrial Complex, Information Tagged: | Andrew J. Oswald, Hamilton College, Stephen Wu, University of Warwick